按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
a Fact in the State of Nature； but it is only Provisory。
Natural right in the state of a civil constitution means the forms
of right which may be deduced from principles a priori as the
conditions of such a constitution。 It is therefore not to be infringed
by the statutory laws of such a constitution； and accordingly the
juridical principle remains in force； that； 〃Whoever proceeds upon a
maxim by which it becomes impossible for me to have an object of the
exercise of my will as mine； does me a lesion or injury。〃 For a
civil constitution is only the juridical condition under which every
one has what is his own merely secured to him； as distinguished from
its being specially assigned and determined to him。 All guarantee；
therefore； assumes that everyone to whom a thing is secured is already
in possession of it as his own。 Hence； prior to the civil
constitution… or apart from it… an external mine and thine must be
assumed as possible； and along with it a right to compel everyone with
whom we could come into any kind of intercourse to enter with us
into a constitution in which what is mine or thine can be secured。
There may thus be a possession in expectation or in preparation for
such a state of security； as can only be established on the law of the
common will； and as it is therefore in accordance with the possibility
of such a state； it constitutes a provisory or temporary juridical
possession； whereas that possession which is found in reality in the
civil state of society will be a peremptory or guaranteed
possession。 Prior to entering into this state； for which he is
naturally prepared； the individual rightfully resists those who will
not adapt themselves to it； and who would disturb him in his provisory
possession； because； if the will of all except himself were imposing
upon him an obligation to withdraw from a certain possession； it would
still be only a one…sided or unilateral will； and consequently it
would have just as little legal title… which can be properly based
only on the universalized will… to contest a claim of right as he
would have to assert it。 Yet be has the advantage on his side； of
being in accord with the conditions requisite to the introduction
and institution of a civil form of society。 In a word； the mode in
which anything external may be held as one's own in the state of
nature； is just physical possession with a presumption of right thus
far in its favour； that by union of the wills of all in a public
legislation it will be made juridical； and in this expectation it
holds comparatively； as a kind of potential juridical possession。
This prerogative of right； as arising from the fact of empirical
possession； is in accordance with the formula： 〃It is well for those
who are in possession〃 （Beati possidentes）。 It does not consist in the
fact that； because the possessor has the presumption of being a
rightful man； it is unnecessary for him to bring forward proof that he
possesses a certain thing rightfully； for this position applies only
to a case of disputed right。 But it is because it accords with the
postulate of the practical reason； that everyone is invested with
the faculty of having as his own any external object upon which he has
exerted his will； and； consequently； all actual possession is a
state whose rightfulness is established upon that postulate by an
anterior act of will。 And such an act； if there be no prior possession
of the same object by another opposed to it； does； therefore；
provisionally justify and entitle me； according to the law of external
freedom； to restrain anyone who refuses to enter with me into a
state of public legal freedom from all pretension to the use of such
an object。 For such a procedure is requisite； in conformity with the
postulate of reason； in order to subject to my proper use a thing
which would otherwise be practically annihilated； as regards all
proper use of it。
CH2
FIRST PART。 PRIVATE RIGHT。
The System of those Laws Which Require No External Promulgation。
CHAPTER II。 The Mode of Acquiring Anything External。
10。 The General Principle of External Acquisition。
I acquire a thing when I act （efficio） so that it becomes mine。 An
external thing is originally mine when it is mine even without the
intervention of a juridical act。 An acquisition is original and
primary when it is not derived from what another had already made
his own。
There is nothing external that is as such originally mine； but
anything external may be originally acquired when it is an object that
no other person has yet made his。 A state in which the mine and
thine are in common cannot be conceived as having been at any time
original。 Such a state of things would have to be acquired by an
external juridical act； although there may be an original and common
possession of an external object。 Even if we think hypothetically of a
state in which the mine and thine would be originally in common as a
communio mei et tui originaria； it would still have to be
distinguished from a primeval communion （communio primaeva） with
things in common； sometimes supposed to be founded in the first period
of the relations of right among men； and which could not be regarded
as based upon principles like the former； but only upon history。
Even under that condition the historic communio； as a supposed
primeval community； would always have to be viewed as acquired and
derivative （communio derivativa）。
The principle of external acquisition； then； may be expressed
thus： 〃Whatever I bring under my power according to the law of
external freedom； of which as an object of my free activity of will
I have the capability of making use according to the postulate of
the practical reason； and which I will to become mine in conformity
with the idea of a possible united common will； is mine。〃
The practical elements （momenta attendenda） constitutive of the
process of original acquisition are：
1。 Prehension or seizure of an object which belongs to no one；
for； if it belonged already to some one； the act would conflict with
the freedom of others； that is； according to universal laws。 This is
the taking possession of an object of my free activity of will in
space and time； the possession； therefore； into which I thus put
myself is sensible or physical possession （possessio phenomenon）；
2。 Declaration of the possession of this object by formal
designation and the act of my freewill in interdicting every other
person from using it as his；
3。 Appropriation； as the act； in idea； of an externally
legislative common will； by which all and each are obliged to
respect and act in conformity with my act of will。
The validity of the last element in the process of acquisition； as
that on which the conclusion that 〃the external object is mine〃 rests；
is what makes the possession valid as a purely rational and
juridical possession （possessio noumenon）。 It is founded upon the fact
that； as all these acts are juridical； they consequently proceed
from the practical reason； and therefore； in the question as to what
is right； abstraction may be made of the empirical conditions
involved； and the conclusion； 〃the external object is mine；〃 thus
becomes a correct inference from the external fact of sensible
possession to the internal right of rational possession。
The original primary acquisition of an external object of the action
of the will； is called occupancy。 It can only take place in
reference to substances or corporeal things。 Now when this
occupation of an external object does take place； the act presupposes；
as a condition of such empirical possession； its priority in time
before the act of any other who may also be willing to enter upon
occupation of it。 Hence the legal maxim： 〃qui prior tempore； potior
jure。〃 Such occupation as original or primary is； further； the
effect only of a single or unilateral will； for were a bilate