按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
and； generally； every one who is compelled to maintain himself not
according to his own industry； but as it is arranged by others （the
state excepted）； are without civil personality； and their existence is
only； as it were； incidentally included in the state。 The woodcutter
whom I employ on my estate； the smith in India who carries his hammer；
anvil； and bellows into the houses where he is engaged to work in
iron； as distinguished from the European carpenter or smith； who can
offer the independent products of his labour as wares for public sale；
the resident tutor as distinguished from the schoolmaster； the
ploughman as distinguished from the farmer and such like； illustrate
the distinction in question。 In all these cases； the former members of
the contrast are distinguished from the latter by being mere
subsidiaries of the commonwealth and not active independent members of
it； because they are of necessity commanded and protected by others；
and consequently possess no political self…sufficiency in
themselves。 Such dependence on the will of others and the consequent
inequality are； however； not inconsistent with the freedom and
equality of the individuals as men helping to constitute the people。
Much rather is it the case that it is only under such conditions
that a people can become a state and enter into a civil
constitution。 But all are not equally qualified to exercise the
right of suffrage under the constitution； and to be full citizens of
the state； and not mere passive subjects under its protection。 For；
although they are entitled to demand to be treated by all the other
citizens according to laws of natural freedom and equality； as passive
parts of the state； it does not follow that they ought themselves to
have the right to deal with the state as active members of it； to
reorganize it； or to take action by way of introducing certain laws。
All they have a right in their circumstances to claim may be no more
than that whatever be the mode in which the positive laws are enacted；
these laws must not be contrary to the natural laws that demand the
freedom of all the people and the equality that is conformable
thereto； and it must therefore be made possible for them to raise
themselves from this passive condition in the state to the condition
of active citizenship。
47。 Dignities in the State and the Original Contract。
All these three powers in the state are dignities； and； as
necessarily arising out of the idea of the state and essential
generally to the foundation of its constitution； they are to be
regarded as political dignities。 They imply the relation between a
universal sovereign as head of the state… which according to the
laws of freedom can be none other than the people itself united into a
nation… and the mass of the individuals of the nation as subjects。 The
former member of the relation is the ruling power； whose function is
to govern （imperans）； the latter is the ruled constituents of the
state； whose function is to obey （subditi）。
The act by which a people is represented as constituting itself into
a state； is termed the original contract。 This is properly only an
outward mode of representing the idea by which the rightfulness of the
process of organizing the constitution may be made conceivable。
According to this representation； all and each of the people give up
their external freedom in order to receive it immediately again as
members of a commonwealth。 The commonwealth is the people viewed as
united altogether into a state。 And thus it is not to be said that the
individual in the state has sacrificed a part of his inborn external
freedom for a particular purpose； but he has abandoned his wild
lawless freedom wholly； in order to find all his proper freedom
again entire and undiminished； but in the form of a regulated order of
dependence； that is； in a civil state regulated by laws of right。 This
relation of dependence thus arises out of his own regulative law
giving will。
48。 Mutual Relations and Characteristics of the
Three Powers。
The three powers in the state； as regards their relations to each
other； are； therefore： （1） coordinate with one another as so many
moral persons； and the one is thus the complement of the other in
the way of completing the constitution of the state； （2） they are
likewise subordinate to one another； so that the one cannot at the
same time usurp the function of the other by whose side it moves； each
having its own principle and maintaining its authority in a particular
person； but under the condition of the will of a superior； and
further； （3） by the union of both these relations； they assign
distributively to every subject in the state his own rights。
Considered as to their respective dignity； the three powers may be
thus described。 The will of the sovereign legislator； in respect of
what constitutes the external mine and thine； is to be regarded as
irreprehensible； the executive function of the supreme ruler is to
be regarded as irresistible； and the judicial sentence of the
supreme judge is to be regarded as irreversible； being beyond appeal。
49。 Distinct Functions of the Three Powers。
Autonomy of the State
1。 The executive power belongs to the governor or regent of the
state； whether it assumes the form of a moral or individual person； as
the king or prince （rex； princeps）。 This executive authority； as the
supreme agent of the state； appoints the magistrates； and prescribes
the rules to the people； in accordance with which individuals may
acquire anything or maintain what is their own conformably to the law；
each case being brought under its application。 Regarded as a moral
person； this executive authority constitutes the government。 The
orders issued by the government to the people and the magistrates；
as well as to the higher ministerial administrators of the state
（gubernatio）； are rescripts or decrees； and not laws； for they
terminate in the decision of particular cases； and are given forth
as unchangeable。 A government acting as an executive； and at the
same time laying down the law as the legislative power； would be a
despotic government； and would have to be contradistinguished from a
patriotic government。 A patriotic government； again； is to be
distinguished from a paternal government （regimen paternale） which
is the most despotic government of all； the citizens being dealt
with by it as mere children。 A patriotic government； however； is one
in which the state； while dealing with the subjects as if they were
members of a family； still treats them likewise as citizens； and
according to laws that recognize their independence； each individual
possessing himself and not being dependent on the absolute will of
another beside him or above him。
2。 The legislative authority ought not at the same time to be the
executive or governor； for the governor； as administrator； should
stand under the authority of the law； and is bound by it under the
supreme control of the legislator。 The legislative authority may
therefore deprive the governor of his power； depose him； or reform his
administration； but not punish him。 This is the proper and only
meaning of the common saying in England； 〃The King… as the supreme
executive power… can do no wrong。〃 For any such application of
punishment would necessarily be an act of that very executive power to
which the supreme right to compel according to law pertains； and which
would itself be thus subjected to coercion； which is
self…contradictory。
3。 Further； neither the legislative power nor the executive power
ought to exercise the judicial function； but only appoint judges as
magistrates。 It is the people who ought to judge themselves； through
those of the citizens who are elected by free choice as their
representatives for this purpose； and even specially for every process
or cause。 For the j