友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
哔哔读书 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

medical essays-第11章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!




And now; on reviewing the whole subject; how shall we account for the extraordinary prevalence of the belief in Perkinism among a portion of what is supposed to be the thinking part of the community?

Could the cures have been real ones; produced by the principle of ANIMAL MAGNETISM?  To this it may be answered that the Perkinists ridiculed the idea of approximating Mesmer and the founder of their own doctrine; that nothing like the somnambulic condition seems to have followed the use of the Tractors; and that neither the exertion of the will nor the powers of the individual who operated seem to have been considered of any consequence。  Besides; the absolute neglect into which the Tractors soon declined is good evidence that they were incapable of affording any considerable and permanent relief in the complaints for the cure of which they were applied。

Of course a large number of apparent cures were due solely to nature; which is true under every form of treatment; orthodox or empirical。 Of course many persons experienced at least temporary relief from the strong impression made upon their minds by this novel and marvellous method of treatment。

Many; again; influenced by the sanguine hopes of those about them; like dying people; who often say sincerely; from day to day; that they are getting better; cheated themselves into a false and short… lived belief that they were cured; and as happens in such cases; the public never knew more than the first half of the story。

When it was said to the Perkinists; that whatever effects they produced were merely through the imagination; they declared (like the advocates of the ROYAL TOUCH and the UNGUENTUM ARMARIUM that this explanation was sufficiently disproved by the fact of numerous and successful cures which had been witnessed in infants and brute animals。  Dr。 Haygarth replied to this; that 〃in these cases it is not the Patient; but the Observer; who is deceived by his own imagination;〃 and that such may be the fact; we have seen in the case of the good lady who thought she had conjured away the spot from her friend's countenance; when it remained just as before。

As to the motives of the inventor and vender of the Tractors; the facts must be allowed to speak for themselves。  But when two little bits of brass and iron are patented; as an invention; as the result of numerous experiments; when people are led; or even allowed; to infer that they are a peculiar compound; when they are artfully associated with a new and brilliant discovery (which then happened to be Galvanism); when they are sold at many hundred times their value; and the seller prints his opinion that a Hospital will suffer inconvenience; 〃unless it possesses many sets of the Tractors; and these placed in the hands of the patients to practise on each other;〃 one cannot but suspect that they were contrived in the neighborhood of a wooden nutmeg factory; that legs of ham in that region are not made of the best mahogany; and that such as buy their cucumber seed in that vicinity have to wait for the fruit as long as the Indians for their crop of gunpowder。


                    …

The succeeding lecture will be devoted to an examination of the doctrines of Samuel Hahnemann and his disciples; doctrines which some consider new and others old; the common title of which is variously known as Ho…moeopathy; Homoe…op…athy; Homoeo…paith…y; or Hom'pathy; and the claims of which are considered by some as infinitely important; and by many as immeasurably ridiculous。

I wish to state; for the sake of any who may be interested in the subject; that I shall treat it; not by ridicule; but by argument; perhaps with great freedom; but with good temper and in peaceable language; with very little hope of reclaiming converts; with no desire of making enemies; but with a firm belief that its pretensions and assertions cannot stand before a single hour of calm investigation。




II。

It may be thought that a direct attack upon the pretensions of HOMOEOPATHY is an uncalled…for aggression upon an unoffending doctrine and its peaceful advocates。

But a little inquiry will show that it has long assumed so hostile a position with respect to the Medical Profession; that any trouble I; or any other member of that profession; may choose to bestow upon it may be considered merely as a matter of self…defence。  It began with an attempt to show the insignificance of all existing medical knowledge。  It not only laid claim to wonderful powers of its own; but it declared the common practice to be attended with the most positively injurious effects; that by it acute diseases are aggravated; and chronic diseases rendered incurable。  It has at various times brought forward collections of figures having the air of statistical documents; pretending to show a great proportional mortality among the patients of the Medical Profession; as compared with those treated according to its own rules。  Not contented with choosing a name of classical origin for itself; it invented one for the whole community of innocent physicians; assuring them; to their great surprise; that they were all ALLOPATHISTS; whether they knew it or not; and including all the illustrious masters of the past; from Hippocrates down to Hunter; under the same gratuitous title。  The line; then; has been drawn by the champions of the new doctrine; they have lifted the lance; they have sounded the charge; and are responsible for any little skirmishing which may happen。

But; independently of any such grounds of active resistance; the subject involves interests so disproportioned to its intrinsic claims; that it is no more than an act of humanity to give it a public examination。  If the new doctrine is not truth; it is a dangerous; a deadly error。  If it is a mere illusion; and acquires the same degree of influence that we have often seen obtained by other illusions; there is not one of my audience who may not have occasion to deplore the fatal credulity which listened to its promises。

I shall therefore undertake a sober examination of its principles; its facts; and some points of its history。  The limited time at my disposal requires me to condense as much as possible what I have to say; but I shall endeavor to be plain and direct in expressing it。 Not one statement shall be made which cannot be supported by unimpeachable reference: not one word shall be uttered which I am not as willing to print as to speak。  I have no quibbles to utter; and I shall stoop to answer none; but; with full faith in the sufficiency of a plain statement of facts and reasons; I submit the subject to the discernment of my audience。


The question may be asked in the outset;Have you submitted the doctrines you are professing to examine to the test of long…repeated and careful experiment; have you tried to see whether they were true or not?  To this I answer; that it is abundantly evident; from what has often happened; that it would be of no manner of use for me to allege the results of any experiments I might have instituted。  Again and again have the most explicit statements been made by the most competent persons of the utter failure of all their trials; and there were the same abundant explanations offered as used to be for the Unguentum Armarium arid the Metallic Tractors。  I could by no possibility perform any experiments the result of which could not be easily explained away so as to be of no conclusive significance。 Besides; as arguments in favor of Homoeopathy are constantly addressed to the public in journals; pamphlets; and even lectures; by inexperienced dilettanti; the same channel must be open to all its opponents。

It is necessary; for the sake of those to whom the whole subject may be new; to give in the smallest possible compass the substance of the Homoeopathic Doctrine。  Samuel Hahnemann; its founder; is a German physician; now living in Paris;〃 'Hahnemann died in 1843。' at the age of eighty…seven years。  In 1796 he published the first paper containing his peculiar notions; in 1805 his first work on the subject; in 1810 his somewhat famous 〃Organon of the Healing Art;〃 the next year what he called the 〃Pure Materia Medica;〃 and in 1828 his last work; the 〃Treatise on Chronic Diseases。〃
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!