按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
toward whom they entertain no group…hostility。 But the man whose
attention is fastened upon the relations of a group with those whom it
hates or fears will judge quite differently。 In these relations a surprising
ferocity is apt to be developed； and a very ugly side of human nature
comes to the fore。 The opponents of capitalism have learned； through the
study of certain historical facts； that this ferocity has often been shown by
the capitalists and by the State toward the wage…earning classes；
particularly when they have ventured to protest against the unspeakable
suffering to which industrialism has usually condemned them。 Hence
arises a quite different attitude toward existing society from that of the
ordinary well…to…do citizen： an attitude as true as his； perhaps also as
untrue； but equally based on facts； facts concerning his relations to his
enemies instead of to his friends。
The class…war； like wars between nations； produces two opposing
views； each equally true and equally untrue。 The citizen of a nation at war；
when he thinks of his own countrymen； thinks of them primarily as he has
experienced them； in dealings with their friends； in their family relations；
and so on。 They seem to him on the whole kindly； decent folk。 But a
nation with which his country is at war views his compatriots through the
medium of a quite different set of experiences： as they appear in the
ferocity of battle； in the invasion and subjugation of a hostile territory； or
in the chicanery of a juggling diplomacy。 The men of whom these facts are
7
… Page 8…
PROPOSED ROADS TO FREEDOM
true are the very same as the men whom their compatriots know as
husbands or fathers or friends； but they are judged differently because they
are judged on different data。 And so it is with those who view the capitalist
from the standpoint of the revolutionary wage…earner： they appear
inconceivably cynical and misjudging to the capitalist； because the facts
upon which their view is based are facts which he either does not know or
habitually ignores。 Yet the view from the outside is just as true as the view
from the inside。 Both are necessary to the complete truth； and the Socialist；
who emphasizes the outside view； is not a cynic； but merely the friend of
the wage…earners； maddened by the spectacle of the needless misery which
capitalism inflicts upon them。
I have placed these general reflections at the beginning of our study； in
order to make it clear to the reader that； whatever bitterness and hate may
be found in the movements which we are to examine； it is not bitterness or
hate； but love； that is their mainspring。 It is difficult not to hate those who
torture the objects of our love。 Though difficult； it is not impossible； but it
requires a breadth of outlook and a comprehensiveness of understanding
which are not easy to preserve amid a desperate contest。 If ultimate
wisdom has not always been preserved by Socialists and Anarchists； they
have not differed in this from their opponents； and in the source of their
inspiration they have shown themselves superior to those who acquiesce
ignorantly or supinely in the injustices and oppressions by which the
existing system is preserved。
8
… Page 9…
PROPOSED ROADS TO FREEDOM
PART I
HISTORICAL
CHAPTER I
MARX AND SOCIALIST DOCTRINE
SOCIALISM； like everything else that is vital； is rather a tendency
than a strictly definable body of doctrine。 A definition of Socialism is sure
either to include some views which many would regard as not Socialistic；
or to exclude others which claim to be included。 But I think we shall come
nearest to the essence of Socialism by defining it as the advocacy of
communal ownership of land and capital。 Communal ownership may
mean ownership by a democratic State； but cannot be held to include
ownership by any State which is not democratic。 Communal ownership
may also be understood； as Anarchist Communism understands it； in the
sense of ownership by the free association of the men and women in a
community without those compulsory powers which are necessary to
constitute a State。 Some Socialists expect communal ownership to arrive
suddenly and completely by a catastrophic revolution； while others expect
it to come gradually； first in one industry； then in another。 Some insist
upon the necessity of completeness in the acquisition of land and capital
by the public； while others would be content to see lingering islands of
private ownership； provided they were not too extensive or powerful。
What all forms have in common is democracy and the abolition； virtual or
complete； of the present capitalistic system。 The distinction between
Socialists； Anarchists and Syndicalists turns largely upon the kind of
democracy which they desire。 Orthodox Socialists are content with
parliamentary democracy in the sphere of government； holding that the
evils apparent in this form of constitution at present would disappear with
the disappearance of capitalism。 Anarchists and Syndicalists； on the other
hand； object to the whole parliamentary machinery； and aim at a different
method of regulating the political affairs of the community。 But all alike
are democratic in the sense that they aim at abolishing every kind of
9
… Page 10…
PROPOSED ROADS TO FREEDOM
privilege and every kind of artificial inequality： all alike are champions of
the wage… earner in existing society。 All three also have much in common
in their economic doctrine。 All three regard capital and the wages system
as a means of exploiting the laborer in the interests of the possessing
classes； and hold that communal ownership； in one form or another； is the
only means of bringing freedom to the producers。 But within the
framework of this common doctrine there are many divergences； and even
among those who are strictly to be called Socialists； there is a very
considerable diversity of schools。
Socialism as a power in Europe may be said to begin with Marx。 It is
true that before his time there were Socialist theories； both in England and
in France。 It is also true that in France； during the revolution of 1848；
Socialism for a brief period acquired considerable influence in the State。
But the Socialists who preceded Marx tended to indulge in Utopian
dreams and failed to found any strong or stable political party。 To Marx； in
collaboration with Engels； are due both the formulation of a coherent body
of Socialist doctrine； sufficiently true or plausible to dominate the minds
of vast numbers of men； and the formation of the International Socialist
movement； which h