友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!阅读过程发现任何错误请告诉我们,谢谢!! 报告错误
哔哔读书 返回本书目录 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 进入书吧 加入书签

what is property-第75章

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!



t my purpose here to pass upon the theory of the right of possession。  I discuss no dogmas。  My only object is to justify my views; and to show that; in writing as I did; I not only exercised a right; but performed a duty。

Yes; I have attacked property; and shall attack it again; but; sir; before demanding that I shall make the amende honorable for having obeyed my conscience and spoken the exact truth; condescend; I beg of you; to cast a glance at the events which are happening around us; look at our deputies; our magistrates; our philosophers; our ministers; our professors; and our publicists; examine their methods of dealing with the matter of property; count up with me the restrictions placed upon it every day in the name of the public welfare; measure the breaches already made; estimate those which society thinks of making hereafter; add the ideas concerning property held by all theories in common; interrogate history; and then tell me what will be left; half a century hence; of this old right of property; and; thus perceiving that I have so many accomplices; you will immediately declare me innocent。

What is the law of expropriation on the ground of public utility; which everybody favors; and which is even thought too lenient?'1'

'1'  In the Chamber of Deputies; during the session of the fifth of January; 1841; M。 Dufaure moved to renew the expropriation bill; on the ground of public utility。




A flagrant violation of the right of property。  Society indemnifies; it is said; the dispossessed proprietor; but does it return to him the traditional associations; the poetic charm; and the family pride which accompany property?  Naboth; and the miller of Sans…Souci; would have protested against French law; as they protested against the caprice of their kings。  〃It is the field of our fathers;〃 they would have cried; 〃and we will not sell it!〃  Among the ancients; the refusal of the individual limited the powers of the State。  The Roman law bowed to the will of the citizen; and an emperorCommodus; if I remember rightlyabandoned the project of enlarging the forum out of respect for the rights of the occupants who refused to abdicate。  Property is a real right; _jus_ _in re_;a right inherent in the thing; and whose principle lies in the external manifestation of man's will。  Man leaves his imprint; stamps his character; upon the objects of his handiwork。  This plastic force of man; as the modern jurists say; is the seal which; set upon matter; makes it holy。  Whoever lays hands upon it; against the proprietor's will; does violence to the latter's personality。  And yet; when an administrative committee saw fit to declare that public utility required it; property had to give way to the general will。  Soon; in the name of public utility; methods of cultivation and conditions of enjoyment will be prescribed; inspectors of agriculture and manufactures will be appointed; property will be taken away from unskilful hands; and entrusted to laborers who are more deserving of it; and a general superintendence of production will be established。  It is not two years since I saw a proprietor destroy a forest more than five hundred acres in extent。  If public utility had interfered; that forestthe only one for miles aroundwould still be standing。

But; it is said; expropriation on the ground of public utility is only an exception which confirms the principle; and bears testimony in favor of the right。  Very well; but from this exception we will pass to another; from that to a third; and so on from exceptions to exceptions; until we have reduced the rule to a pure abstraction。

How many supporters do you think; sir; can be claimed for the project of the conversion of the public funds?  I venture to say that everybody favors it; except the fund…holders。  Now; this so…called conversion is an extensive expropriation; and in this case with no indemnity whatever。  The public funds are so much real estate; the income from which the proprietor counts upon with perfect safety; and which owes its value to the tacit promise of the government to pay interest upon it at the established rate; until the fund…holder applies for redemption。  For; if the income is liable to diminution; it is less profitable than house…rent or farm…rent; whose rates may rise or fall according to the fluctuations in the market; and in that case; what inducement has the capitalist to invest his money in the State?  When; then; you force the fund…holder to submit to a diminution of interest; you make him bankrupt to the extent of the diminution; and since; in consequence of the conversion; an equally profitable investment becomes impossible; you depreciate his property。

That such a measure may be justly executed; it must be generalized; that is; the law which provides for it must decree also that interest on sums lent on deposit or on mortgage throughout the realm; as well as house and farm…rents; shall be reduced to three per cent。  This simultaneous reduction of all kinds of income would be not a whit more difficult to accomplish than the proposed conversion; and; further; it would offer the advantage of forestalling at one blow all objections to it; at the same time that it would insure a just assessment of the land… tax。  See!  If at the moment of conversion a piece of real estate yields an income of one thousand francs; after the new law takes effect it will yield only six hundred francs。  Now; allowing the tax to be an aliquot partone…fourth for exampleof the income derived from each piece of property; it is clear on the one hand that the proprietor would not; in order to lighten his share of the tax; underestimate the value of his property; since; house and farm…rents being fixed by the value of the capital; and the latter being measured by the tax; to depreciate his real estate would be to reduce his revenue。  On the other hand; it is equally evident that the same proprietors could not overestimate the value of their property; in order to increase their incomes beyond the limits of the law; since the tenants and farmers; with their old leases in their hands; would enter a protest。

Such; sir; must be the result sooner or later of the conversion which has been so long demanded; otherwise; the financial operation of which we are speaking would be a crying injustice; unless intended as a stepping…stone。  This last motive seems the most plausible one; for in spite of the clamors of interested parties; and the flagrant violation of certain rights; the public conscience is bound to fulfil its desire; and is no more affected when charged with attacking property; than when listening to the complaints of the bondholders。  In this case; instinctive justice belies legal justice。

Who has not heard of the inextricable confusion into which the Chamber of Deputies was thrown last year; while discussing the question of colonial and native sugars?  Did they leave these two industries to themselves?  The native manufacturer was ruined by the colonist。  To maintain the beet…root; the cane had to be taxed。  To protect the property of the one; it became necessary to violate the property of the other。  The most remarkable feature of this business was precisely that to which the least attention was paid; namely; that; in one way or another; property had to be violated。  Did they impose on each industry a proportional tax; so as to preserve a balance in the market?  They created a maximum PRICE for each variety of sugar; and; as this maximum PRICE was not the same; they attacked property in two ways;on the one hand; interfering with the liberty of trade; on the other; disregarding the equality of proprietors。  Did they suppress the beet…root by granting an indemnity to the manufacturer?  They sacrificed the property of the tax…payer。  Finally; did they prefer to cultivate the two varieties of sugar at the nation's expense; just as different varieties of tobacco are cultivated?  They abolished; so far as the sugar industry was concerned; the right of property。  This last course; being the most social; would have been certainly the best; but; if property is the necessary basis of civilization; how is this deep…seated antagonism to be explained?'1'

'1' 〃What is Property?〃 Chap。 IV
返回目录 上一页 下一页 回到顶部 0 0
未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!